1. The applicant is facing trial before Additional Sessions Judge, Kamber on the charges punishable under sections 379, 511, 324 and 34, P.P.C. According to the F.I.R., which was lodged on 2-1-2000 at 12-00 noon, the applicant was apprehended by the complainant party at about 1-00 a.m. At night on the previous night, and one rifle was also secured from him.
2. ' The only ground on which the bail plea is opposed by the learned State Counsel is that he was apprehended by the complainant party on the spot where he had gone to commit theft. However, neither any theft was committed nor anybody was injured in this case. The fact that the applicant, who was apprehended by the complainant party at 1-00 a.m. At night was produced before the police at 12-00 noon, creates a doubt about the prosecution case, which entitles the applicant to bail. Accordingly, he is admitted to bail subject to surety in the sum of Rs,75,000 and P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.