Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2001 P Cr. L J 80

MUHAMMAD NADIM BUTT and another vs THE STATE

Citation2001 P Cr. L J 80
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,3476/B of 2000
Date2000-09-01
Judge(s)Iftikhar Hussain Chaudhry
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

' Petitioners are accused in case F.I.R. No,5 of 2000, dated 15-1-2000, under section 302/324/148/149/109, P.P.C., Police Station Batapur, Lahore. According to allegations contained in the first information report, Muhammad Tufail alias Shera Butt alongwith a number of persons including the petitioners, while variously armed went to the shop of brother of the complainant, started bad-mouthing and then declared that he would be taught a lesson for enmity with Liaqat Ali. According to the complainant in his view, Muhammad Tufail fired with pistol which hit his brother and then Shabbir Ahnad fired at the victim. Asif Butt fired at Babar Butt, while Muhammad Irfan fired at Naveed Butt. According to the complainant, the other accused continued firing in the air and kept extending threats of life to anybody who approached the scene of occurrence.

2. It has been contended on behalf of the petitioners that they were ascribed an artificial role on account of relationship with other accused and that the only role ascribed by them was that of ineffective firing which was not corroborated by any other evidence brought on file. Learned counsel for the State and the complainant strenuously opposed the prayer made. It was urged that all the accused having armed themselves with lethal weapons had gone to the shop of the victim and the present petitioners had also used their weapons and prima facie, were vicariously, liable for the offence committed and did not deserve concession of bail.

3. Admittedly, the allegation against the petitioners is that of ineffective firing. The weapons employed by them in the course of occurrence were not recovered. The spent casings recovered from the spot matched with the weapons recovered at the instance of other accused and in these circumstances, case of the petitioners is, considered to be that of further inquiry.

4. Petitioners are allowed bail in the sum of Rupees one lac with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of trial Court.

5. In case the petitioners misused the concession of bail in any manner, the complainant or the State would be at liberty to approach the Court for cancellation of bail being allowed to the petitioners.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch