1. ' The applicant is charged with an offence under section 377, P. P. C. And in support of this bail application it is alleged that there was delay of four hours in lodging the F. I. R. And that there is direcrepancy between the F. I. R. And the 164, Cr. P. C. Statements of certain witnesses named in the F. I. R. It may at once be stated that before the Sessions Court the bail application was not pressed on merits, for the limited prayer was to allow the applicant to appear in an examination which prayer was granted. To my mind four hours delay in lodging the report is prima facie understandable in view of the offence with which the applicant is charged and the minor discrepancies in the F. I. R. And the 164, Cr. P. C. Statements are not such as to arrive at the conclusion that no case under section 377, P. P. C. Is made out against the applicant. The doctor's certificate prima facie A supports the prosecution. In these circumstances there is no merit in this bail application and it is dismissed with these observations however, that nothing stated herein will prejudice the applicant at the trial and the applicant will be at liberty to move fresh basil application after the evidence of the boy and the doctor is recorded.