' Petitioner alongwith three others is involved in a case under section 302/307/34, P. P. C. Registered against them on 8-5-1976. He was arrested on 11-5-1976 and since then is in Jail. In this application for bail, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the petitioner is not the person who has caused any injury to the deceased. The injury ascribed to the petitioner on the witness is simple. It is, next, contended that the occurrence has taken place on the shop of the petitioner's father where petitioner's father an brother were given injuries with sharp-edged weapons.
According to the prosecution itself the petitioner was called by the petitioner's father during the court of altercation. It is submitted that in all the circumstances of the case, the petitioner is not liable to be sentenced to imprisonment for 10 years or more.
2. Learned counsel for the State has stated that the petitioner is names in the F. I. R. And shared the common intention of the offence.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, it appears that requires further enquiry as to whether the petitioner is liable to be sentence to more than 10 years R. I. Or not. The fact that the petitioner was call by his father and his father and brother have received sharp-edged injured and the petitioner caused a simple injury to a P. W. Would entail that h need not remain in jail all the time until the trial takes place which is liked to take long. In all the circumstances of the case, the petitioner is allowed bail in the sum of Rs, 10,000 (ten thousand) with two sureties in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner, Sheikhupura.