Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2000 P Cr. L J 493

MUHAMMAD SARWAR alias SARRO vs THE STATE

Citation2000 P Cr. L J 493
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,316/B of 1999
Date1999-02-01
Judge(s)Raja Muhammad Sabir
ResultBail refused

ORDER

' The petitioner seeks his post-arrest bail in case F.I.R. No,141 of 1998, dated 7-3-1998 registered at Police Station Baghbanpura, under section 395, P.P.C.

2. Brief facts of the case are that complainant Muhammad Yaqoob submitted an application to the local police for registration of case against five accused persons with the allegation that he was a truck driver and on 7-3-1998 at 4-30 a.m. Was proceeding towards Jallo More on Truck number 6615/PRB. When he reached near octroi post Mehmood Booti five persons whose ages and structures have been given in the F.I.R., armed with deadly weapons, suddenly emerged out and stopped him. They snatched Rs,40,000 from him and also took away the truck. He further stated that he and P.W. Ghafoor Hussain could identify the accused.

3. The present petitioner was arrested in another case on 29-6-1998. A pistol .30 bore was recovered from him and was sent to jail. Subsequently, during identification parade conducted by the Magistrate on 7-8-1998, the petitioner was identified by the complainant and a sum of Rs,5,000 was also recovered at his pointation.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that he is in jail since 29-6-1998 and the trial Court has not recorded evidence of even a single witness so far. He is not named in the F.I.R. And as such entitled to grant of bail.

5. Learned State Counsel has opposed the grant of bail.

6. Although the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. But he was identified by the complainant in the identification parade held under supervision of a Magistrate on 7-8-1998. Recovery of Rs,5,000 was also made on his pointation. The police has collected sufficient material prima facie, to connect him with the commission of alleged crime. The offence under section 395, P.P.C. Is a heinous and falls within the prohibitory clause. I am, therefore, not persuaded to release him on bail at this stage. This petition is without any merit and is hereby dismissed.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch