1. ' WAJIHUDDIN AHMED, J.---The only ground urged in respect of this review petition is that under rule 2(iv) of the Rules of Admission (P.58) those candidates who could not be considered in the previous session due to late issuance of domicile/ PRC etc. Would be eligible to apply. It is added that the petitioner's case was exactly the same because in the previous year the petitioner had not been able to get her PRC. When asked whether this question was raised by the petitioner in the High Court or in the leave petition before us, Mr. Muhammad Muzaffarul Haque maintained that the same had been agitated in one of the replies submitted by the petitioner in this Court. This is no way of coming up with a new question of fact. Besides the learned counsel has neither been able to place a copy of the earlier admission form of the petitioner or of the order of rejection thereof at any stage. Manifestly, a review in this Court is not a further appeal and the scope thereof is extremely limited. Nothing that the petitioner has urged now alters the decision already rendered.
2. ' Dismissed.