' MUNIR A. SHEIKH, J.---This petition for leave to appeal is directed against the order dated 21-10- 1996 of the Lahore High Court through which application filed by the petitioners for restoration of their revision petition which was dismissed for non-prosecution on 23-6-1996, has been dismissed as barred by time.
2. The revision petition filed by the petitioners was dismissed for non- prosecution on 23-6-1996.
Application for restoration of the same was filed on 20-10-1996 alleging that the petitioners came to know about the dismissal of the revision petition on 13-10-1996 when the respondents approached the Executing Court for execution of the decree against which the said revision petition was directed. The ground for seeking restoration of the revision petition was that on 23-3- 1996, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners when approached the Court, he was informed by the Reader that the case has not been taken up and the same had been adjourned to a date in office as left over case.
3. The application for restoration of the revision petition was admittedly barred by time. No application for condonation of delay was filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act, therefore, the learned Single. Judge dismissed the said application as barred by time observing that in the absence of any application seeking condonation of delay, the same could not be condoned.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has failed to persuade us that the impugned order suffers from any illegality. He frankly conceded that no application for seeking condonation of delay along with the application seeking restoration of the main petition had been filed.
5. For the foregoing reasons, this petition has no force which is accordingly dismissed and leave to appeal refused.