' Learned counsel for the petitioner argues that the petitioner claims herself to be wife of Imdad Hussain, as such she has committed no offence, and is entitled to the concession of bail. Further submits that she is on interim pre-arrest bail for the last about 8 months and has not misused the concession in any manner. Also submits that the petitioner being woman, there are different parameters to consider her application for bail. The bail is opposed by learned counsel for the complainant on the ground that the petitioner's alleged Nikah with Imdad could not be verified: that she has not joined the investigation hence she is not entitled to the concession of bail.
2. It is true that the petitioner being accused is bound to join and associate with the investigation.
As regards the allegation that she is wife of Gulzar or Imdad, it needs further probe and inquiry and it will not be in the interest of justice to keep her in confinement just as a matter of punishment. In view of this matter, the interim bail already granted to the petitioner is hereby confirmed. She will submit fresh bail bond in the sum of Rs, 30,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.
3. In case the petitioner does not join the investigation or misuses the concession in any manner, the trial Court will be at liberty to cancel her bail. Disposed of with the above observations. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.