Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
2000 MLD 1271

EJAZ AHMED vs STATE

Citation2000 MLD 1271
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Revision No, 119 and Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1452 and
Date2000-03-02
Judge(s)Amanullah Abbasi
ResultOrder accordingly

ORDER

1. ' The applicant has been charged with commission of Qatl-e-Amd under section 302 of Pakistan Penal Code. The applicant submitted an application that Tazkiyat-ul-Shahood be conducted in respect of all prosecution witnesses, whereupon the learned trial Court passed impugned order dated 13-10-1999 it was observed that credibility of witness under Tazkiyat-ul-Shahood will be considered at the time of passing judgment, but in compliance with section 17 of the Qanun-e- Shahadat Order questions will be put to the witness before recording his evidence. The applicant does not seem to be satisfied with this order and has moved this Court under section 439, Cr.P.C.

2. ' I have heard Mr. Shahadat Awan, learned counsel for the applicant and Miss Rana Khan, Advocate for the State, at great length.

3. ' Mr. Awan has argued that in case the charge for Qatal liable to Qisas (which is a Hadd punishment) is to be pressed, the standards of evidence according to Holy Qur'an and Sunnah have to be met in terms of section 304, P.P.C., though the applicant may be subjected to Ta'zir punishment even if such standards are not met. Therefore, he argued that Tazkiat-ul-Shahood was required to be conducted according to the method elaborately laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court (Shariat Appellate Bench) in Ghulam Ali v. The State PLD 1986 SC 741.

4. I have carefully gone through the requirements prescribed by the Honourable Supreme Court, pointed out by the learned counsel. Viewed in the above context, no serious objection can be found to the observations of the learned trial Court to the effect that questions will be put to the witness (to determine his credibility) before recording his evidence, though his credibility will finally be determined at the time of passing judgment. Mr. Awan, however, has pointed out that mere putting of questions to a witness for determining Tazkiat-ul-Shahood is not the only requirement of law. In the Circumstances, to allay any misapprehension it may be observed that for the purpose of imposing a Hadd punishment, it is necessary that standards of evidence prescribed in Qur'an and Sunnah are met and accordingly Tazkiatul-Shahood is determined on the basis of principles laid down by the Honourable Supreme Court in Ghulam Ali v. The State PLD 1986 SC 741. Accordingly, Muzakki's will also have to be examined at the time when questions are being put to witnesses.

5. ' With these observations, application stands disposed of alongwith miscellaneous applications.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch