Pakistan Case Law← Search
PLD 2000 Lahore 414

AYAZ DURRANI and otherss vs CHAIRMAN, WAPDA and others

CitationPLD 2000 Lahore 414
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Writ Petitions Nos.10467, 1575 of 1999 and 1363 of 2000
Date2000-04-05
Judge(s)Malik Muhammad Qayyum
ResultPetition allowed

This judgment shall dispose of Writ Petitions Nos.10467/99, 1575/99 and 1363/2000 in which common question falls for determination.

2. The petitioner is stated to be Chief Executive of the Company incorporated under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 by the name of Ayyaz Textile Mills Limited which had obtained electric connection.

The petitioner was threatened with recovery of some amount through coercive measures. He consequently filed W.P. No,10467 of 1999 which was admitted to regular hearing by this Court on 24- 9-1995 and it was directed that no coercive measures shall be taken in the meanwhile. It is a matter of regret that the respondents instead of honouring the order passed by this Court flouted it by arresting the petitioner and forcing him to pay a sum of Rs,3,38,585 as a condition for his release. In, the second petition, this action of the respondents has been assailed.

3. The learned counsel has contended that in the present case, the consumer was the incorporated Company namely, Ayyaz Textile Mills Limited and the petitioner has no personal liability even though he may be Chief Executive of the Company.

4. This contention of the learned counsel is in accord with law. It A needs no gainsaying that a Company incorporated under the Companies Ordinance, 1984 is a separate and distinct juristic person quite apart from its Chief Executive, Director or the shareholders. The liability of such a Company cannot fall upon the directors or the shareholders who have no personal responsibility for the same. This view is supported by Tariq Saeed Saigol v. The District and Taxation Officer 1982 CLC 2387; Muhammad Anwar Khan Tiwana v. Mst. Sadeeqa Begum and 4 others PLD 1984 Lah. 411 and Shamim-ud-Din v. Federal Government of Pakistan through Chairman, WAPDA, Lahore and 4 others 1995 CLC 299.

In view of what has been said above, these petitions are allowed and the action of the respondents in recovering the disputed amount from the petitioner is declared to be without any lawful authority and of no legal effect. No order as to costs.

Cited by 7 cases

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search