Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1977 P Cr. L J 525

The STATE vs ABDUL HALEEM

Citation1977 P Cr. L J 525
CourtSindh High Court
Case No.Criminal Reference No, 47 of 1975
Date1975-05-13
Judge(s)Mushtaq Ali Kazi
ResultReference allowed

This is a criminal reference by Additional Sessions Judge, Karachi recommending that an order dated 10-1-1975 passed by A. D. M. & Deputy Commissioner, South, Karachi may be quashed.

2. The facts in brief are that one Abdul Elalim, resident of Karachi filed a direct complaint for offences under sections 420 and 467, P. P. C. Against (1) Master Loung Khan, and (2) Ghulam Dastgir residents of District Dadu. It was alleged in this complaint filed in the Court of A. C. M. 12, Karachi, that the complainant had executed special power of attorney in favour of accused No, 1 for sale of certain agricultural land situated in Dadu District. He, however, came to know that accoused No, 1 on instigation of accused No, 2 had misused the power and forged a document in respect of a portion of the agricultural land in order to defraud him. The learned A. C. M. Issued process, that is bailable warrants under section 204, Cr. P. C. After taking cognizance on this complaint. While perusing the daily dak the learned Deputy Commissioner and A. D. M. South, Karachi, came across these bailable warrants issued for offence under section 420 and 467. He, therefore called for the record and proceedings of that case from the Court of A. C. M. No, 21, Karachi. On perusal of the record he found that the Magistrate had!, issued the process without holding a preliminary enquiry.

The learned A. D. M. Therefore, set aside the order passed by the A. C. M. And remanded the case to him with directions to hold preliminary enquiry under section 202, Cr. P. C. Obviously the learned A.

D. M. Had no powers to quash the order passed by the A. C. M. Under section 204, Cr. P. C. The learned A. D. M. Has, therefore, exercised power which did not belong to him and his order is on the face of it, illegal and without jurisdiction.

3. The learned Assistant Advocate-General frankly concedes that the A. D. M.'s order cannot be allowed to stand and he supports the present petition.

4. In the result the order of the A. D. M. Dated 10-1-1975 is set aside and the A. C. M. 12 is directed to complete the proceedings in accordance with law.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch