Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
PLD 2000 Peshawar 3

ADAM KHAN vs THE STATE

CitationPLD 2000 Peshawar 3
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Appeal No,72 of 1998
Date1999-07-01
Judge(s)Abdur Rauf Khan Lughmani, Shehzad Akbar Khan
ResultAppeal accepted

ABDUR RAUF KHAN LUGHMANI, J.--On 13-1-1997 at 13-30 hours, in order to arrest accused in case F.I.R. No,14, dated 13-1-1997 under section 302/34, P.P.C., the local police blocked the road near Paharkhel. In the meantime, two persons were seen coming. The police party after hot pursuit arrested them. The persons disclosed their names as Rasool Khan and Adam Khan, appellant, herein. Out of latter's possession, the police party allegedly recovered one .30 bore pistol with '30 live rounds. He was accordingly, arrested in the case and a case under section 13, Arms Ordinance was registered against him, vide F.I.R. No,15, dated 13-1-1997.

2. After the completion of usual police investigation, challan was put in Court. The trial Court at the end of trial, convicted the appellant under section 13, Arms Ordinance and sentenced him to undergo three years' R.I. With a fine of Rs,10,000 or in default to further S.I. For six months. The appellant/convict has now filed the instant appeal challenging the validity of his conviction/sentence recorded by the learned Speical Judge, Lakki, dated 6-11-1998.

3. The prosecution case is that recovery of .30 bore pistol was made from the appellant. On the other hand the appellant in his statement recorded under section 342, Cr.P.C. Denied the recovery of the said pistol and in fact said that the same was recovered from one Izzat Khan. In support of prosecution case, there is no arms expert report regarding bore of the pistol. Even there is no report of Armourer of the Police Department. In these circumstances, the nature of the arm recovered from the appellant has not been determined. Reliance is placed at PLJ 1995 Pesh. 176 and PLD 1994 Lahore 93.

4. This being the position, we are of the view that the prosecution has failed to determine nature of the arms i,e, its bore etc. Accordingly, this appeal is accepted. The conviction and sentence recorded by the learned Special Judge, Lakki is set aside and the appellant is acquitted of the charge. He be set at liberty forthwith if not required in any other case.

Cited by 3 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch