' The brief facts giving rise to this revision petition are that respondents Nos.1 to 4 filed application under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act before the learned Senior Civil Judge, Lahore who accepted the application and price of the acquired land was assessed to the tune of Rs,1,550 per marla of the categories of the land which is not proved on file on behalf of respondents vide judgment, dated 31-7-1993. It appears that the judgment of the Senior Civil Judge, Lahore, dated 31-7-1993 remains in the field as the same was not set aside by any higher Court. Respondents Nos.1 to 4 filed an execution application on 5-6-1994; during the pendency of aforesaid execution proceedings, respondent No,6 has paid Rs,21 lacs to respondents Nos.1 to 4 but respondent number 6 did not pay interest to them which was demanded by respondents 1 to 4 amounting to Rs,30 lacs.
The Trial Court froze Account No,12 of respondent No,6 vide order, dated 29-9-1998. Subsequently, the same was modified on the application of Javed Enterprises on 1-3-1999; thereafter, the Trial Court again froze the aforesaid account vide order, dated 26-7-1999. The petitioner filed application for modification of the order, dated 26-7-1999 but the same was dismissed by Senior Civil Judge vide order, dated 23-9-1999; hence the present revision petition.
2. Petitioner's counsel states that respondents Nos.1 to 4 have only claimed amounting to Rs,30 lacs, against respondent No,6, therefore, learned S.C.J., dismissed the application of the petitioner without any justification and without applying mind.
3. Notice was issued to respondents Nos.5 and 6; respondent No,5 did not enter appearance in spite of service, therefore, he is proceeded ex parte. The representative of respondent No,6 entered appearance alongwith learned Law Officer, he admitted that claim of respondents Nos.1 to 4 is amounting to Rs,30 lacs.
' In view of these circumstances, the orders of the Trial Court are modified and it is ordered that Rs,30 lacs or amount due of respondents Nos.1 to 4 will remain be attached in Account Head No,12 and the remaining amount in the Head would stand released. The petitioner is well within his right to file an application for release of his amount before respondent No,6 who is of course duty- bound to decide the same strictly in accordance with law.
' With the aforesaid observation this petition is disposed of.