Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1999 P Cr. L J 1700

SHAMRAIZ and another vs THE STATE and anothers

Citation1999 P Cr. L J 1700
CourtPeshawar High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No,254 of 1998
Date1998-10-30
Judge(s)Sardar Muhammad Raza Khan
ResultOrder accordingly

' Shamrez and Gulzeb, sons of Banaras of village Siriya, Haripur, having been charged under section 337-A(ii)/337-F(v)/452/34, P.P.C. Vide F.I.R. No,223, dated 23-5-1998 of Police Station Kot Najibullah and having been refused bail by the forums below, are before this Court.

2. Mst. Zakia Bibi wife of Abdus.Sattar is a complainant in this case. On 29-5-1998 at 2100 hours while in injured condition and along with her injured daughter Mst. Rukhsana lodged a report at Police Station Kotnajibullah that on the day of occurrence after "Peshi" prayers, she along with her daughter and other children was present in her house when Shamraiz petitioner knocked at her door. Basharat, her son opened the door whereupon shamrez said that he had brought a "Jirga" and as to where her husband Abdus Sattar was. Saying this, both Shamrez and Gulzeb entered the house. Gulzeb gave an axe blow on the wrist of Mst. Zakia Bibi complainant while Shamrez injured Mst. Rukhsana Bibi with his axe on her head. Gulzeb also injured Mst. Zakia Bibi on her head as well as legs. There was no male present in the house and the report was lodged only after when her husband returned home.

3. The medical report of Mst. Zakia indicates that though she was injured at her hands as well as head but the blow at the left wrist had fractured the ulna.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners claimed that the 'offence against both the victims falling under sections 337-A(ii) and 337-F(v), P.P.C. Do not fall under the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. And hence the petitioners be released on bail particularly when the principal punishment of the offences is "Daman" or "Arsh".

5. No doubt that the original punishment of the offences is the same as alleged by the learned counsel for the petitioners but regard being had to the circumstances of the case, the Court can award imprisonment as well which falls within the prohibitory clause of section 497, Cr.P.C. The accused Gulzeb while armed with a deadly weapon had entered the house of Mst. Zakia Bibi when she had no protection of a male in the house and, therefore, I decline to use discretion in his favor.

6. So far as Shamrez is concerned, he is charged for causing injury on the head of Mst. Rukhsana Bibi but there is no fracture of any bone, rather, in according to the doctor, no bone injury was seen.

His case deserves leniency.

7. Consequently, the application of petitioner Gulzeb is rejected while Shamrez accused is directed to be released on bail provided a bond in sum of Rs,80,000 with two local, reliable resourceful sureties is furnished to the satisfaction of Illaqa Magistrate alone.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch