Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1977 P Cr. L J 529

SADIQ AND ANOTHER vs THE STATE

Citation1977 P Cr. L J 529
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 551/B of 1975
Date1975-04-09
Judge(s)Ataullah Sajjad
ResultN/A

ORDER

The two petitioners alongwith two other co-accused are facing enquiry for commission of double murder of Barkat All and Abbad Khan. Riaz the co-accused of the petitioners was armed with a pistol, while Ali Akbar bad a spear and Sadiq a dang. Riaz Ahmed fired hitting Abbad Khan.

Thereafter the accused are said to have caused injuries to both the deceased persons. The occurrence took place on 16-12-1973 and Sadiq petitioner was arrested on 19-12-1973. The police took about nine months to file the Challan in the Court. The case appears to have baen dealt with in a leisurely manner and I find from the report of the learned Magistrate that from 7-9-1974 till 22- 9-1974 the accused were not produced in the Court. They were not produced on 9-10-1974, 14-10- 1974, 30-12-1974 and 1-1-1975. The evidence of three witnesses were recorded on 4th February 1975, and the other three witnesses were examined on 12-2-1975.

2. The main ground raised in this case is that of delay. It is submitted that the accused have now been in jail for about 16 months and were not produced in Court on a number of occasions. It is further submitted that Sadiq is an old man of about 60 years of age and the allegation that he caused dang injuries to the two deceased persons is not fully borne out by the medical evidence.

3. The learned counsel points out that Barkat deceased had an abrasion on his right ankle measuring 3/5" and 1/2' and Abbad had an abrasion on left hand measuring 3/4' and 1/2'. The learned counsel submits that these injuries could not have been inflicted by dang and could have been caused by friction or some other cause during the incident. The facts of this case indicate that a concerted attack was made on the two deceased persons. The weapons with which the accused were armed appear to have been used. I am not called upon to finally say here whether the injuries attributed to Sadiq could or could not have been caused by dang but in view of the fact that he is stated to be of age and was not produced from jail on about 7 or 8 hearings, I direct that he shall be released on bail in the sum of Rs, 10,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Inquiry Magistrate. The petition of Ali Akbar is dismissed.

4. I find that the Challan in this case was extremely delayed and there are indications that there was no serious effort either on the part of the Police or the learned Magistrate to finalise this inquiry within a reasonable time. I direct the learned Magistrate to charge the Investigating Officer concerned personally with the duty of the service of the Superintendent Police. If necessary be may issue service process for the presence of the witnesses. I shall like to have a report from him after three months.

Cited by 1 case

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch