Pakistan Case Law← Search
1999 PLC 50

MUHAMMAD ASHIQ vs MANAGING DIRECTOR, BATALA KISSAN INDUSTRY,

Citation1999 PLC 50
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Judge(s)Mian Ghulam Ahmad
ResultAppeal dismissed.

' By an order dated 22-5-1996, learned Presiding Officer of the Labour Court at Multan returned the grievance petition of Muhammad Ashiq, filed under section 25-A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, for its presentation before the proper forum; and he has come up in appeal to this Court, filed under section 37(3) ibid.

2. Muhammad Ashiq was an employee of Batal Kisan Industry/Dairy, Chowk Arifwala, Lahore- Multan Road, Sahiwal. His services were dispensed with on 27-6-1995, when his monthly salary was Rs,3,100. He laid claim to an amount of Rs,1,01,300 as arrears of his dues, by approaching the Labour Court, Multan (camped at Sahiwal), under section 25-A ibid. The respondent concerned raised initial objection against the competence of the petition, by contending that person actually in service of a concern, although having been working there as a workman, could only have recourse to a Labour Court. A person dismissed, discharged, retrenched, laid off or otherwise relayed from an employment, not in consequence of an industrial dispute also cannot have access to the aforesaid forum, as was held in 1994 SCM R 2213 and 1998 PLC 1. Worker's service rights, guaranteed and secured under any law, or award or a settlement could also be enforced through the Labour Court. The right sought to be secured by the appellant, in this case, however does not fall under the aforesaid category; and undeniably he is no longer in service of the concern or the industry which he claims to have served for a number of years. He was, as such, disentitled to enforce his claim to the emoluments or the dues in dispute, through the Labour Court.

3. The finding recorded in that behalf by the learned Labour Court, Multan cannot be differed with and is hereby affirmed. There was no need to call upon the parties to lead evidence for or against the claim in question, the objection raised preliminarily being purely legal. The appeal has evidently no merit and is hereby dismissed, although I leave the parties to bear the irrespective costs of the litigation.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search