Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1999 PLC 440

Messrs GENERAL TYRE & RUBBER CO. OF PAKISTAN LTD. through Manager

Citation1999 PLC 440
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Judge(s)Tanzil-ur-Rehman
ResultOrder accordingly.

' This is a revision. My attention is drawn to a consent order passed by this Tribunal in Revision Application No,KAR-391 of 1998. Referring to clause (3), para. 4 thereof, it was agreed by both the counsel that, "the complaint of the respondent under section 56, of I.R.O. 1969, dated 4-11-1997 will be taken up after the decision on the main case".

2. It is, therefore, apparent that the above said complaint was to be taken up after the decision on the main case. I am informed that the complaint under section 56 is fixed on every date of hearing, of course, with no proceeding, but with the insistence that the accused be present on each and every date, fixed therein. According to Mr. Mahmood Ghani, it is misuse of powers of the Court.

3. When the learned Presiding Officer is very well-aware that no proceedings can be taken up in the complaint at all why the accused is insisted upon to be present on every date.

4. After hearing the counsel for the parties at some length. I am of the view that it is no use fixing the complaint under section 56 along with the application under section 25-A, of the I.R.O., 1969.

The proper course, in my view, would be to first decide the application under section 25-A, I.R.O., on merits after allowing full opportunity to both the parties and if at all, after hearing, the learned Presiding Officer comes to the conclusion, prima facie, that the accused has willfully made in any application or other document submitted under this Ordinance or the rules thereunder any statement which he knew or had reason to believe to be false, the learned Presiding Officer may take up the hearing of the complaint under section 56, after issuance of the proper notice, giving the reason for resorting to intended action under section 56 and fixing a date for hearing of the same for appearance of the accused.

5. Therefore, it is ordered that the complaint under section 56, of the I.R.O., 1969 will now be adjourned sine die and may be taken up after the decision on application under section 25-A, of the I.R.O., 1969.

6. Since there will be vacations of the Labour Courts from 1-6-1999, it will be appreciated, if the application under section 25-A, of I.R.O., 1969 is decided latest by 31-7-1999, so as to enable the learned Presiding Officer to take up the application under section 56 of I.R.O., 1969 thereafter.

7. The revision application is disposed of accordingly.

' Announced in open Court, this the 21st day of May, 1999.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch