IJAZ AHMED, J.- The brief facts out of which the present writ petition arises are that the petitioner filed a suit for restitution of conjugal rights where the respondent filed a suit for dissolution of marriage on 30.1.1997 before the Family Court at Mandi Baha-ud-Din who by consolidated judgment dismissed the suit for restitution of conjugal rights and accepted the suit for dissolution of marriage vide judgment and decree dated 23.6.1998.
2. Feeling aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 23.6.1998 the petitioner filed this writ petition on the ground that the learned Family Court did not consider the ground of Khula in real perspective and therefore the judgment of the family Court is according to the law declared by the Superior Courts and not in accordance with the Injunctions of Islam. Learned counsel for the respondent contended that respondent has solemnised second marriage on 10.1.1997.
3. I have given my anxious consideration to the contentions of the learned counsel for the parties'. It is settled proposition of law that Court cannot take notice of subsequent event as is held by the Superior Courts. I am fortified by the dictum laid down by the reported judgment (1990 CLC 1069) as the respondent has solemnised second marriage. Therefore, this petition is not maintainable and the same is dismissed.