Pakistan Case Law← Search
1999 PTD 3537

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs NATIONAL SPORTS CLUB OF INDIA (NO.2)

Citation1999 PTD 3537
CourtDelhi High Court
Case No.Income-tax References Nos.249 of 1982 and 191 of 1983
Date1997-08-08
Judge(s)R. C. Lahoti, J. K. Mehra
ResultReference answered

1. ' R.C. LAHOTI, J.---This is a reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, at the instance of the Revenue arising out of the assessment years 1976-77 and 1977-78, respectively, seeking the opinion of the High Court on the following two questions of law (for each of the two years): ."(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in holding that the rent receipts from the members to whom the rooms were let out by the assessee- club alongwith other facilities were not assessable to income-tax on the doctrine of mutuality?

(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal, is correct in law in holding that the income from swimming pool and stadium should be taxed under the head 'Business' and not under the head 'Income from house property'?"

2. ' We have heard and disposed of I.T.R. Nos.282-283 of 1979 (CIT v. National Sports Club of India (1997) 230 ITR 777) between the, same parties raising similar questions though for different assessm ent years. Consistently ' with the view taken therein, these references are disposed of by answering the two questions as stated hereinafter.

3. ' Consistently with the view taken by us following the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case CIT v. Bankipur Club Ltd. (1997) 226 ITR 97, question No,1 is answered in the affirmative, i,e,, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

4. ' As regards question No,2, it is not clear from the order of the Tribunal if the swimming pool and the stadium were let out as properties to outsiders, i,e,, other than the members. The Tribunal was, therefore, right in holding that the income from the swimming pool and the stadium at Bombay was rightly taxed under the head "income from business" and not under the head "income from house property". The question is answered accordingly, i,e,, in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

5. ' No order as to costs.

6. ' One copy each of this order shall be placed on the record of the two cases of these references.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search