' The petitioner prays for his after arrest bail in case F.I.R., No,10 of 1997: dated 18-1-1997 under sections 302/34, P.P.C., registered at Police Station Thingi District Vehari.
2. Concisely the allegation against the petitioner is that he was driving a Tractor in the land of one Ghulam Nabi and he intentionally trampled the sticks of the complainant party as a result of which a quarrel took place. The petitioner called for his brothers and other co-accused. Farooq is alleged to have fired at deceased Ishaque. No avert act is attributed to the petitioner in the F.I.R.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner did not cause any injury to the deceased or any of the P.Ws. He was arrested on 24th January, 1997 and since then he is in jail. No avert act in attributed to the petitioner who is entitled to be released on bail.
4. Learned State Counsel has opposed the bail on the ground that the offence falls within the prohibitory clause.
5. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. The petitioner is not attributed any active role except that he called his brothers and other co-accused to the place of occurrence. He is in jail since 24-1-1997. The challan has been submitted in the Court but not a single witnesses is reported to have been examined so far. The case of the petitioner needs further enquiry. Therefore, I am inclined to admit the petitioner to bail in the sum of Rs,100,000 with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court.