' This is a revision application under suo motu power of the Court vested under section 38(3-a) of I.R.0 1969 which was presented on 19th December, 1998.
2. I have perused the order, dated 24-8-1998 impugned in the present revision.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was ' a workman with respondent No,4. His services were orally terminated on 28-4-1997 in retaliation to the formation of trade union. He gave grievance notice to respondent No,4. Having received no reply he filed grievance application under section 25-A, of the I.R.O. 1969, thereafter, he also filed a complaint under section 51(1) of I.R.O., 1969 before the Labour Court. A formal charge was framed against respondents Nos.2, 3 and 4 in May, 1997. Mr. Rafiullah stated at the bar that there were no further proceedings in the application under section 51(1), I.R.O. 1969 after framing of the charge. About a year after on 21st May, 1998 an application was moved by the respondent under section 249-A, Cr.P.C. which is still pending. The learned Labour Court after hearing the learned counsel for the parties passed an order whereby he stopped the hearing of application under section 249-A as well as complaint and ordered to proceed with the application under section 25-A of I.R.O., 1969.
4. I have thoughtfully considered the impugned order and I find no infirmity, incorrectness or illegality or impropriety in the order impugned before me and as such the Revision Application is dismissed in limine.
' Announced in open Court the 1st day of February, 1999.