1. ' The brief and relevant facts for disposal of this petition are that the petitioners Nos.1 and 2 are serving as casual Drivers and petitioners Nos.3 and 4 are working as Fitter Maintenance and maintenance helpers since 1988 and 1993 respectively. They claim that after completion of 90 days they have attained the status of permanent workmen in the respondent company. The respondent company have filled in vacancies of Drivers and Helpers in hundred but they have not made the petitioners permanent incumbents. This is all because of the petitioners being interested in becoming regular member of the trade union existing in the respondents Establishment. The petitioners have prayed for direction to the respondent to confirm the petitioners as permanent workman of the respondents company.
2. ' The respondent put his appearance through counsel who has filed written statement raising certain preliminary objections therein.
3. ' I have gone through the pleadings of the parties and material placed on record. Learned counsel for the parties have also argued their respective cases at quite some length which I have considered carefully.
4. It is established and settled law that this Commission has got the jurisdiction only to entertain and adjudicate upon the cases of unfair labour practice. While perusing the petition I have found no averment made therein of any act or event which could lead to constitute an act of unfair labour practice. Mere allegation devoid of detailed/events and circumstances which could lead to commission of an act of unfair labour practice is not sufficient to entertain and adjudicate upon by this Commission. This Commission has no jurisdiction to decide such like cases. The petition being