MUHAMMAD AYUB KHAN (MEMBER).---Facts of the case as verified from the record, are that the appellant, appointed as Laboratory Assistant. in B.5 Government High School Ali Ithel, North Waziristan Agency (Miranshah) was appointed as steno typist B.12 purely on ad hoc basis terminable at any time on availability of a qualified/regularly selected person vide order by Divisional Personnel Officer. Pak. Railways, Lahore contained in Endst. No,220-E/1/2254/PSC, dated 28-11-1987 duly circulated to all concerned.
2. The appellant subsequently applied and prayed for counting his previous service from 18-5-1981 to 5-12-1987 (which he rendered in the Education Department (FATA), towards "pension, Seniority etc." vide his application, dated 26-9-1997 but it was rejected on a plea that his service as steno typist was yet not regularized. His departmental appeal, dated 1011-1997 (not responded) and hence, the present appeal has been filed in this Tribunal which is within time.
3. We have heard the learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record. It was stated that the bar that despite rendering about eleven years' service the appellant as not been confirmed in his grade and that he was also entitled to count his previous six years toward length of service and seniority. He could not produce any authority in support of his contention when required.
4. A perusal of his application for appointment as Steno available on the record indicates that its induction was effected due to political patronage. The matter of his unauthorized and illegal induction also did not escape notice of the "Audit" which took serious exceptions to it so much so that the entire drawl of Rs,300,073 on account to pay and allowances was ordered to be recovered from the appellant with the following observations, which, it appears, prompted him for seeking refuge elsewhere.
The audit, therefore, advised as under in its report, dated 9-10-1996:-- "(i) The matter be investigated at appropriate level and responsibility fixed for irregular continuation of the services of the employee for the last 9 years;
(ii) Services of the employee be discontinued forthwith and action taken against those held responsible;
(iii) Expenditure incurred on pay and allowances of the Steno-typist be recovered/regularized and; (iv)Cases of the similar nature be reviewed and action taken accordingly."
5. Ad hoc service unless regularized by the "competent Authority" does not confer any right either for regular absorption as of right or counted towards seniority except that it is counted towards length of service for the purpose of pension if ultimately regularized. In the instant case the appellant has subjected twice to Steno-typist test held on 5-7-1988 and 5-10-1988.but failed. His services should have been disposed with in the event of his failure in two tests. Law requires filling of vacancies inclusive of ad hoc appointments through its publication in newspapers as per instructions of the Government contained in ESTACODE-1989 PP. 142-143 inclusive of "avoidance of favoritism or nepotism in ad hoc appointments "for safeguarding rights of the real deserving candidates sherry in the public interest".
6. Keeping in view the facts on file, as briefly discussed above, this appeal fails and is dismissed in limine.