1. ' SAIDUZZAMAN SIDDIQUI, J.---The petitioner is seeking leave to appeal against the judgment of Federal Service Tribunal, dated 23-10-1995 whereby his service appeal was dismissed.
2. ' In seeking leave to appeal, the learned counsel for the petitioner firstly contended that although under the relevant rules the appellate authority is entitled to enhance, reduce or modify the penalty imposed on the employee but it has no power to remand the case for a fresh inquiry by the competent Authority. It is also contended by the learned counsel that while remanding the case for fresh inquiry, the appellate authority did not mention any ground in support of the order of remand.
3. In the impugned judgment of the Service Tribunal the order passed by the appellate authority has been reproduced which shows that the appeal of the petitioner was accepted and the case was remanded for retrial on some technical grounds but the technical ground on which case was remanded and appeal was accepted, have neither been specified nor any other reason is given by the appellate authority.
4. We grant leave to appeal in the above case to consider the legal point whether the order passed by the appellate authority remanding the case without specifying the reasons therefor, was an order properly passed in the case within the scope of powers enjoyed by it under Pakistan WAPDA Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1978? revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.