' Through the instant Constitution petition learned counsel seeks to question an order of transfer passed by the respondents in respect of the petitioner whereby he has been transferred from G.P.O., Rawalpindi to Directorate-General, Pakistan, Post Office, Islamabad.
2. The petitioner is a civil servant. The dispute raised by him as to his transfer from Rawalpindi to Islamabad is a dispute which relates to the terms and conditions of his service as a civil servant.
This being so, the jurisdiction of this Co'irt to entertain any dispute with respect to such a matter is expressly barred by Article 212 of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. The instant petition cannot be, therefore, entertained. Reliance, for the view that I take, is placed on 1997 SCMR 167 = 1997 PLC (C.S.) 121; (Miss Rukhsana Ijaz v. Secretary, Education Punjab and others), 1997 SCMR 169 = 1997 PLC (C.S.) 123 (Ayyaz Anjum v. Government of Punjab and others and 1997 SCMR 170 = 1997 PLC (C.S.) 124 (Rafique Ahmad Chaudhry v. Ahmad Nawaz Malik and others).
3. For all the aforesaid reasons, the instant Constitution petition is misconceived and is dismissed as such in limited. The petitioner, however, is at liberty to agitate his grievance before an appropriate Service Tribunal. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.