Pakistan Case Law← Search
1977 P Cr. L J 111

Mst, GHULAM JANNA T AND ANOTHER vs HAQ NAWAZ AND ANOTHER

Citation1977 P Cr. L J 111
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No, 232/Q of 1976
Date1976-04-19
Judge(s)M. S. H. Qureshi
ResultProceedings quashed

ORDER

' The petitioners have produced the girl in question, i. e., Mst. Manzoor Bibi.

2. The facts giving rise to the present petition for quasbment have already been given in my order of the previous date. From a perusal of the record since received. I find that the basis on which search warrant had been issued by the learned Magistrate under section 1CO, Cr. P. C. For recovery and production of Mst. Mumtaz Begum was the oral assertion of Haq Nawaz that he was the husband of Mst. Mumtaz Begum, the marriage having been performed during the minority and that she had been living with him in conjugal relations for the last four years. In support of this assertion, he had filed an agreement purported to have been executed between him and the said Mst.

Mumtaz on 10-12-1975 incorporating her admission of the fact of that marriage. This to my mind was not sufficient to raise a presumption as to the subsistence of the marriage. The Muslim Family Laws Ordinance which has been in force since 1961 envisages that a marriage performed should be registered. No nikahnama had been produced. 1, therefore, find no satisfactory basis for the learned Magistrate having issued the warrant.

3. Since the girl herself is present and has been duly identified by the parties, despite the discrepancy in the name as given by her and as contained in Haq Nawaz's application under section ICO, Cr. P. C. I have recorded her statement which she has willingly made before this Court: ' Statement of Mst. Manzoor Bibi, daughter of Ghulam Muhammad, aged 12 years and months, resident of Kotli Bhatta, Tehsil Kabirwala, District Multan, on solemn affirmation:- ' My name is Manzoor Bibi and not Mumtaz Begum. I was not married to Haq Nawaz (points out to Haq Nawaz respondent). In fact I am not married to anyone.

(Sd.) M. S. H. Qureshi, Judge.

4. As already held by me, the material before the learned Magistrate did not justify the issuing of the warrant. The position has become all the more clear by the statement made by the girl. 1 have, therefore, no hesitation in quashing the proceeding started before the learned Magistrate on the application filed by Haq Nawaz under section 100, Cr. P. C. I order accordingly.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search