Pakistan Case Law← Search
1998 PLC (C.S.) 300

MUHAMMAD RIAZ, DIRECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN PUBLIC WORKS

Citation1998 PLC (C.S.) 300
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Civil Petition No,158 of 1997
Date1997-03-31
Judge(s)Mukhtar Ahmed Junejo, Abdul Hafeez Memon
ResultPetition dismissed

ORDER

1. ' ABDUL HAFEEZ MEMON, J.---This petition is directed against an order dated 28-2-1997 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench in Civil Miscellaneous No,688 of 1997 filed in Writ Petition No,351 of 1997. In this order passed at the preliminary stage, the learned Single Judge made inter alia the following observations:-- "Prima facie, the conduct of the respondent does not appear to be consistent with the service discipline. He will be put to notice that in case this writ petition is accepted he will have to bear the cost of the petition from his own pocket. Observations with regard to his delinquent conduct may also be made in the final judgment by this Court."

2. ' The learned Single Judge further observed that respondent Murid Ahmad Baluch, who had taken charge of Central Civil Division No,III, Islamabad and was performing his function against that post, would not be disturbed.

3. ' Petitioner Muhammad Riaz, who is Director General of Pak. P.W.D., Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, has appeared in person to argue this petition. The petitioner submitted that the only reason for his filing this petition was that he felt aggrieved by the observations made by the learned Single Judge, reproduced above, which are likely to prejudice him and, therefore, he would be satisfied and will not press this petition if a direction is given to the learned Court to decide the writ petition on its own merits without being influenced by the said observations made regarding the petitioner.

4. ' Mr. Bashir Ahmad Ansari, learned counsel for the respondent stated that he had no objection if such direction, as prayed by the petitioner, is given by this Court. In the circumstances, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. We, however, direct that the learned High Court will not be influenced by the said observations made against the petitioner, while deciding the writ petition on merits.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search