1. ' MANZOOR HUSSAIN SIAL, J.---Learned counsel for petitioners contended that Writ Petition No,D-389 of 1994 was mainly dismissed by the Sindh High Court on the ground that the same was not maintainable in law as the alternate remedy was available to the petitioners and resort to that had already been 'made without awaiting the result thereof, the observation of the Court was untenable because the circumstances of the instant case required determination on merits.
2. In our view the learned Judges of the High Court has rightly dismissed the writ petition on the ground of availability of the alternate remedy to the petitioners and having filed appeal against the order of Director, Trade Organization, before the Federal Government. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners stated that the Federal Government has disposed of the appeal and the petitioners intend to challenge that order before the Sindh High Court in writ jurisdiction.
3. ' In this view of the matter, we are not inclined to grant leave to appeal in this case and dismiss this petition.