Pakistan Case Law← Search
1998 PTD 1579

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT CENTRAL

Citation1998 PTD 1579
CourtMadras High Court
Judge(s)K. A. Thanikkachalam, M. V. Balasubramanian
ResultOrder accordingly

1. ' THANIKKACHALAM, J.---At the instance of the Department, the Tribunal referred the following common question for the assessm ent years 1973-74 and 1976-77 for the opinion of this Court under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961: "Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the interest on securities and dividend were business income of the assessee entitled to deduction under section 80-P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?"

2. ' The point for consideration in these tax cases is whether the assessee is entitled to deduction under section 80-P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with regard to interest on securities and dividend income?

3. ' In so far as the deduction claimed under section 80-P(2)(a)(i) of the Act with regard to the interest on securities is concerned, the assessee is entitled to deduction as claimed in view of the earlier decision of this Court in the case of CIT v. Madurai District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd.

4. (1984) 148 ITR 196.

5. ' In so far as the deduction claimed with regard to the dividend is concerned, the deduction was granted by the Tribunal under section 80-P(2)(c) of the Act. The assessee was receiving dividend on shares in companies to the extent of Rs,2,705 for the assessment year 1973-74 and Rs,3,205 for the assessm ent year 1976-77. Since these amounts fall below the exemption limit of Rs,20,000 under section 80-P(2)(c) of the Act, deduction was granted by the Tribunal. The conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal is supported by the provisions contained in section 80-P(2)(c) of the Act wherein it is stated that in the case of co-operative society engaged in activities other than those specified in clause (a) or clause (b) (either independently of, or in addition to, all or any of the activities specified).So much of its profits and gains attributable to such activities as does not exceed twenty thousand rupees is not includible. Exemption is available inasmuch as the assessee satisfied the conditions prescribed in the above said provisions. Therefore, the assessee is entitled to deduction of dividend income in both the assessment years under consideration. Accordingly, we answer the questions referred to us in the affirmative and against the Department.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search