' IRSHAD HASAN KHAN, J.---Leave to appeal is sought against the judgment, dated 18-7-1996, passed by the Lahore High Court, Rawalpindi Bench, Rawalpindi, in Civil Revision No,361-D of 1996.
2. The brief facts are that one Abid Hussain Shah filed a suit for possession through pre-emption against the petitioner in respect of the suit land purchased by him alongwith his brother. Ibrahim, respondent No,1 herein, also filed a suit for possession through pre-emption on the basis of his tenancy in the land, which was decreed on 27-4-1990. The pre-emption money was deposited and the same was also withdrawn by the brother of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner filed a suit for permanent injunction praying that respondent No,1 be restrained from interfering in his possession. The suit was dismissed by the trial Court on 26-5-1995. The appeal filed by him also met the same fate. The petitioner filed a revision petition, which was also dismissed vide impugned judgment dated 18-7-1996. Hence, this petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent No,1 slept over the decree passed in his favour and filed the execution application on 5-11-1992, the same was, therefore, not liable to be enforced on account of laches. The contention is devoid of any force. The learned Judge in Chambers rightly held that the pre-emption money having been received by the petitioner and tenancy accepted, he was estopped to challenge the decree dated 27-4-1980.
The learned Judge was also right in holding that the Revenue Officer was duty bound to bring the Revenue Record up-to-date in conformity with the binding adjudication of Civil Court. The concurrent findings recorded by the Courts below do not suffer from any illegality warranting interference. Resultantly, the petition is dismissed and .