SYED JAMSHED ALI, J.- Land measuring 26 Kanals situated in Mauza Nara Shamali Tehsil & District Khushab was owned by Sher Bahadar. He had purchased this land in open auction followed by mutation NO. 207 attested on 30.4.1969 (Ex. P.4). Vide Mutation No. 209 attested on 10.5.1969 (Ex.t-P- 3), it was sold to Dost Muhammad respondent. Against the said sale the present petitioner and respondent Sultan Bibi filed separate pre-emption suits. These suits were consolidated. The vendee contested the suits, necessary issues were framed and the suits were tried.
2. Vide judgment dated 16.12.1982 of the learned trial Court the petitioner was held to be a co- sharer and Sultan Bibi, the rival pre-emptor, was found to the owner of the estate. The suit filed by the petitioner was, accordingly, decreed and in case of her failure to deposit sale consideration by the given date, Mst. Sultan Bibi was entitled to the decree.
3. Against the said judgment and decree not only Mst. Sultan Bibi, the rival pre-emptor, but also Dost Muhammad, the venuee, filed two appeals. Vide judgment and decree dated 3.5.1984 of the learned District Judge, Khushab. Both the appeals of the vendee were dismissed. However, the appeal of Mst. Sultan Bibi was allowed. The learned First Appellate Court held the petitioner to be an owner of the estate, a status equal to Mst. Sultan Bibi, the rival pre-emptor. Accordingly, the decree was modified in terms that the two pre-emptors will share equally, the disputed land.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has assailed the findings of learned District Judge primarily on the ground of non reading of material evidence. He particularly referred to that party of the statement of Mst. Sultan Bibi wherein the petitioner was admitted to be a co-sharer.
5. I have examined the record carefully. Jamabadni for 1970-71 (Ext. P2) shows the petitioner as a co-sharer in Khata No. 1. This has been rejected by the learned District Judge on the ground that it does not establish that the petitioner was a co-sharer in the khata on the date of sale i.e. 10.5.1969.
6. On examination of the record, it has been found that sale in favour of Sher Bahadar, the vendor, through public auction, was of a fraction of joint khata No. 1. As per entries of mutation No. 207 (Ext.
P.4) the share auctioned from Khata No. 1 belonged to Muhammad Khan and Muhammad Hayat, brothers of the petitioner. This fact has been conceded by the rival pre-emptor Mst. Sultan Bibi who appeared in the witness box as DW1. The share purchased by Sher Bahadar in Khata No. 1 was sold by him vide Mutation No. 209 (Ext. P.3). This sale was also from Khata No. 1. Jamabandi Ext. P.2 for 1970-71 also relates to Khata No. 1 in which the petitioner has been mentioned as co-sharer.
7. Mst. Sultan Bibi, the rival pre-emptor, while appearing as DW1 clearly admitted that the petitioner was a co-sharer alongwith her brothers Muhammad Hayat and Muhammad Khan. The effect of Ext. P.3 & P-4 and the admission of Mst. Sultan Bibi was altogether ignored by the learned District Judge Bhakkar. Ext. P. 1 (Jamabandi for 1970-71) read with Ext. P.3 and Ext. P.4 and the admission of Mst. Sutlan Bibi, clearly establish the petitioner as a co-sharer.
8. In view of the above, this petition is allowed, the impugned judgment and decree of the learned District Judge, a Khushah are set-aside and the decree of the learned trial Court is restored.