MUHAMMAD ILYAS, J.---Facts giving' rise to this petition are that the Model Town Cooperative Society, Lahore, established under the Co--operative Societies Act, 1925, was superseded by the then Martial Law Administrator, Zone-A by promulgating Martial Law Order No.856, on 30th March, 1982 and the Deputy Commissioner, Lahore was appointed as its Administrator. It was laid down in para. 3 of the said Martial Law Order that the Government may at any the revive the Society. In a writ petition (W.P.2439/1989) filed by the respondents, Naseer Ahmed Khan and others, before the Lahore High Court, it was alleged that in pursuance to the said paragraph, the Government of the Punjab decided on 22nd August, 1985, to revive the. Society from 1st July, 1986 -but requisite steps were not taken to implement the decision relating to revival of the Society. The respondents, therefore, filed the writ petition seeking a direction to the petitioners, Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Punjab, Lahore and others, to implement the decision taken by the Government on 22nd August, 1985. It was maintained by the respondents that during the pendency of the writ petition, the Government of the Punjab, on 10th December, 1991, passed order rescinding its earlier decision of 22nd August, 1985, in regard to the revival of the society. This order was also challenged by the respondents by making addition to the grounds mentioned in the writ petition.
2. The writ petition, which was resisted by the petitioners, was accepted by a Single Judge of the Lahore High Court and the Government of the Punjab was directed to revive the Society by taking all steps pursuant to its decision, dated the 22nd August, 1985, within ninety days.
3. The petitioners seek leave to appeal against the judgment of the learned Judge in Chamber by which the writ petition was disposed of as aforesaid.
4. While hearing the petition, keeping in view the various grounds pressed therein, we--- wanted to have look at the decision of the Government of Punjab by which the Society was allegedly revived.
On this, an undated Cabinet decision was produced before us which bears the following heading:- - "Report on the Model Town Cooperative Society (1962) Ltd.
Case No. CAB-II-1-12/85(6).
The said decision is reproduced below:- "The Cabinet was briefed about the background of the case under discussion. It was stated that the Governor/M.L.A. Was pleased to supersede the Model Town Cooperative Society vide MLO No.856 dated 30-3-1982 and appoint the Deputy Commissioner, Lahore as its Administrator. After taking over the charge of this Society, the Administrator prepared a working paper, pin-pointing the problems being faced by it. The working paper was considered in a meeting held under the Chairmanship of the Chief Secretary and a number of decisions were taken. A committee was set up under the Chairmanship of the Secretary, Local Government and Rural Development to examine whether the area falling within the jurisdiction of Model Town should continue as an segregated unit or it should be merged with the rest of the city of Lahore. Its report was placed before the Cabinet on 5-6-1983. The Cabinet decided that the other concerned departments should also be consulted. In pursuance of this decision of the Cabinet, a number of meetings were held and now the Committee has suggested that the Model Town Cooperative Society may be allowed to maintain its separate entity and should not be merged in Lahore Municipal Corporation in view of its long standing and sound financial position. It should govern its own affairs through representatives, elected through the proposed new system. The Cabinet was briefed about the causes of the failure of the previous management of the Society, and safeguards which should be provided for the smooth functioning of the Society in future, including its administrative set-up. It was stated that the Society suffered mostly because of loose control, mismanagement, misuse of power and funds, for the rectification of which several proposals were submitted. It was also suggested that the present arrangement in which Commissioner is the Administrator of the Society be continued for another one year to ensure continuity of development works, and the Society be restored on 1st of July, 1986.
2. The Cabinet discussed the pros and cons of the restoration of the Model Town Cooperative Society and observed that in the proposed amendments, President of the Society has got to meagre powers, which should be enhanced. It was also suggested that the Secretary of the reformed Society should be a departmental person, an official from the Cooperative Department.
Law Department was of the view that the legal aspects of the case have not been fully examined to which it was stated that it, is only the approval in principle that is being sought from the Cabinet.
Before presenting the Rules/Bye-Laws in the next Cabinet meeting in its final shape, the draft would be vetted by the Law Department.
DECISIONS "(1) In principle, it was agreed that the area falling within the jurisdiction of Model Town should continue as a segregated unit under the administration of the Model Town Cooperative Society.
(2) Cooperative Department would submit a detailed report regarding the proposed amendments in the structure, functions, management and constitution of the Model Town Cooperative Society, in a draft form, after vetting it from the Law Department and in consultation with the Local Government Department.
(3) Powers of the President of the Society, would be increased and Secretary of the Society will be from the Cooperative Department.
(4) Society will be revived on 1-7-1986."
5. No order or notification was issued, under the signatures of any functionary of the Government of the Punjab, on the basis of the above decision produced before us. This gave rise to the question whether the decision of the Cabinet was synonymous with the decision of the Government keeping in view the provisions of Articles 129 and 139 of the Constitution which read as follows:-- "129. Exercise of executive authority of the Province.--The executive authority of the Province shall vest in the Governor and shall be exercised by him, either directly or through officers subordinate to him, in accordance with the Constitution.
139. Conduct of business of Provincial Government.--(1) All executive actions of the Provincial Government shall be expressed to be taken in the name of the Governor.
(2) The Governor shall by rules specify the manner in which orders and other instruments made and executed in his name shall be authenticated, and the validity of any order or instrument so authenticated shall not be questioned in any Court on the ground that it was not made or executed by the Governor.
(3) The Governor shall also make rules for the allocation and transaction of the business of the Provincial Government. "
6. Since the above question involves interpretation of the Constitutional provisions, leave is granted to inter alia, examine whether the aforementioned decision of the Cabinet can be treated as a decision of the Government within the meanings of paragraph 3 of the Martial Law Order whereby the Model Town Cooperative Society was dissolved.
7. Status quo shall be maintained during the pendency of the instant petition, which now stand converted into an appeal.
8. In view of the nature of the matter, the appeal will be fixed for an early date.