DECISION Heard Mr. Gohar Iqbal for the Applicant.
This Revision Application is directed against the order of Second Sind Labour Court, Karachi dismissing the application of the applicant for restoration of the petition. The petition under section 25-A of the I.R.O. Was fixed on 9-8-1994 and adjourned to 24-8-1994. On that date the applicant remained absent. Mr. Gohar Iqbal was also absent. After 28 days the Application for Restoration was filed on the ground that they did not appear in Court on the date of hearing due to mistake in recording correct date in the diary: The learned Labour Court held that since sufficient cause for non-appearance was not shown the matter could not be restored. Against this order Mr. Gohar Iqbal has moved this Revision Application. This Tribunal has to consider a Revision Application only on the grounds of legality, impropriety or correctness. Apparently there is no defect in the order of the Labour Court which can be called a legal defect. Here the question is one of fact which has been disposed of by the Labour Court. The Revision Application therefore does not lie under section 38(3-a) of the I.R.O.
2. The application is accordingly dismissed in limine. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.