Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1997 MLD 2553

MUNSHI vs THE STATE

Citation1997 MLD 2553
CourtLahore High Court
Case No.Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1217/B of 1995
Date1995-04-10
Judge(s)Rashid Aziz Khan
ResultBail allowed

ORDER

Petitioner Munshi seeks bail in a case registered against him and others with Police Station Garjakh, Gujranwala vide F.I.R. Dated 28-7-1994 for an offence under section 10 of the Offence of Zina (Enforcement of Hudood) Ordinance No.VII of 1979. The case was got registered by Mst. Salma Bibi with the allegation that on 24-7-1994 at about 2-30 Noon she after doing day's work as a maid servant came and sat in a room on the upper storey of the house. In the meanwhile, petitioner with his two co-accused came from the adjoining roof of the house and after bolting the door from inside the petitioner raped the first informant whereas his co-accused Kalu kept a pistol on the temple of the first informant. In the meanwhile, Mst. Zainab, mother of the first informant, came, whereupon the petitioner with his two co-accused ran away.

2. It was contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the case was got registered with an unexplained delay of four days which casts serious doubt. Argued that according to the report of the lady doctor, who initially examined the first informant, rape was not committed on her as the hymen was found in-; tact. Asserted that the report of the Chemical Examiner may not be of much significance because vaginal swa bs were taken five days after the occurrence. The contentions were opposed by learned Assistant Advocate-General.

3. I have heard the learned counsel and gone through the file. There is no explanation available why the case was got registered with a delay of four days. Medico-legal report of the lady doctor, who examined the prosecutrix makes it a case of further inquiry. The medico-legal report is in conflict with the assertion of the prosecutrix. In these circumstances, the application is accepted and the petitioner is allowed bail provided he furnishes security in the sum of Rs.50,000 (rupees fifty thousand only) with two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of Assistant Commissioner/Duty Magistrate, Gujranwala.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch