Report and parawise comments have been submitted in which it has been admitted that according to merit position the petitioner was entitled to get appointment but inadvertently he was considered to have obtained 60 marks instead of 70 marks which he actually obtained.
2. Ghulam Hussain Waraich. Deputy District Education Officer, states that one seat is still available and the department would have appointed the petitioner but the Government has imposed ban on fresh recruitments. When questioned he submitted that the order of the Provincial Government imposing ban was issued subsequent to the appointments made by the departmental authority.
3. Since the appointment of the petitioner could not be made inadvertently which is not the fault of the petitioner, therefore, against one available seat the petitioner shall be appointed as the ban imposed by the Provincial Government subsequently would not be applicable to the case of the petitioner as he was deprived of his right of appointment on merit at the the when the others were appointed when the ban had not been imposed.
4. The respondents are hereby directed to appoint the petitioner as P.T.C. Teacher. The writ petition stands disposed of. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.