1. ' The appellant is in custody since more than three years (since 16-12-1992) and appeal is pending for decision with no fault of the appellant.
2. ' Mr. A. Lateef Ansari, A.A.-G. Opposes the suspension of sentence on the ground that learned counsel for the appellant has not submitted the record regarding the previous conviction or other cases, if any, pending against him. Learned A.A.-G. Further states that learned counsel for the appellant has not submitted the case diaries.
3. ' Learned A.A.-G. Is on Court notice, if there is any delay on account of appellant, he should point out the same. He is unable to point it out. So far the previous conviction and antecedents are concerned Advocate-General is supposed to place the same in Court, A.A.-G. Is not able to submit the record pertains to previous conviction and antecedents.
4. In view of non-submission of previous conviction or antecedents or delay on the part of the appellant. Under the circumstances in my humble opinion the case for the suspension of sentence is made out. Consequently, the application is granted. The appellant may be released on bail on his furnishing a solvent surety in the sum of Rs,2,00,000 (Rupees two lacs). And P.R. Bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Registrar of this Court. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.