Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
1997 SCMR 1183

BAHADAR And 5 Others vs The STATE

Citation1997 SCMR 1183
CourtSupreme Court of Pakistan
Case No.Cr. Appeal No.322 of 1991 Cr.Misc. No.2 of 1995
Date1995-06-07
Judge(s)Fazal Karim, Irshad Hasan Khan, Saad Saood Jan
ResultSentence suspended

ORDER

SAAD SAOOD JAN, J.---The six petitioners, namely, Bahadar, Ghulam Qadir, Zahoor, Hashim, Qasim and Abdul Ghafoor, were convicted along with three others by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vehari, on charges under sections 302 and 307, read with section 149, and section 148, Pakistan Penal Code. In respect of the offence under section 302 they were sentenced to imprisonment for life. And in respect of offences under section 307 and section 148 the learned Court directed them to undergo different terms of imprisonment. In addition they were also asked to pay fines. All the substantive sentences were directed to run concurrently. They filed an appeal against their convictions and sentences before the High Court. The appeal has not yet been disposed of even though a period of more than three years has advanced since their conviction. They applied for suspension of their sentences but their prayer in this regard was rejected by the High Court. They now seek leave to appeal from this Court.

2. Under section 426(1-A), Criminal Procedure Code, a person under a sentence of imprisonment for life becomes ordinarily entitled to be released on bail if his appeal is not decided within a period of to years of his conviction. If the appellate Court denies him this benefit it must record its reason for the denial. The High Court has not recorded its reasons for not extending the benefit of this provisions to the petitioners; it only directed that their appeal should be listed for hearing on 15-5- 1995. It may be mentioned that their appeal was not heard on that day. In the circumstances, we convert this petition into appeal and direct that they shall be released on bail on their executing bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000 with to sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Assistant Commissioner, Vehari.

Cited by 2 cases

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch