ORDER RASHID AZIZ KHAN, J.- Learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that no evidence is available against the petitioner.
Nobody saw the petitioner committing the offence nor any recovery of weapons has been effected at tire instance of the petitioner. Submits that petitioner at the time of occurrence was less than 13 years of age which entitles him to the concession of bail. Contentions were opposed by learned counsel for the State as well counsel for the . Complainant.
2. I have heard the learned counsel and gone through the file. According to the police investigation, petitioner along with his co-accused were working as a painter in i.e the house. Recovery of golden ornaments has been effected from the petitioner which was identified by the witness as the property of his deceased mother. Blood-stained clothes of the petitioner were recovered from his house. There is evidence of two witnesses who saw the petitioner with his co-accused entering the house of the deceased on the day of occurrence. Contention of the learned counsel is correct that there is no direct evidence but 1 Teel, prima facie, there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to connect the petitioner with-the alleged offence. No ground for hail is made, out. Petition fails which is dismissed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.