Pakistan Case Lawโ† Search
K.L.R. 1996 Revenue Cases 104

UMAR HAYAT, And Another vs THE STATE

CitationK.L.R. 1996 Revenue Cases 104
CourtBoard of Revenue
Case No.ROR Nos. 1642 to 1647 of 1995
Date1995-05-25
Judge(s)Riaz Ali
ResultN/A

ORDERRAZA ALI, MEMBER. These six revision petitions have been preferred by the petitioners for restoration of their lease.

2. Brief facts of these cases are that the petitioners were allotted state land as detailed below in Chak No. 129/ MB, Tehsil Yazman, District Bahawalpur in 1995:-ROR No. Name of Petitioner Detail of land with percentage,1642/95 Umar Hayat son of Sarang Sq. Bl, 223/1, KiUa No. 2 to13, Lot No. 3, measuring %Kanals1643/95 Nazcer Ahmad son of Lot Nc. 20, Rectangle No. 183,Sardar I6, 34 Killa Nos. 1 to l2,13-min, measuring I0O Kanals. Killa No. 13-min, 14 to 25, measuring I0O Kanals.Lot No. 9, Rectangle No. 203/19 9 Kalas Nos. 2 to 9, 22 and l2, 13-min, 14 and 15 measuring I0O Kanals.Lot No. 22, Rectangle No. 163/12, Sq. No. 35, Kalla Nos. 4 to 7,14 to 18, 23 to 25 measuring 96 Kanals.Lot No, 3 Rectangle No. 30/12,9, Killa No. 1 to 3,9 to l2,20 to 22, measuring 96 Kanals..1947/95 Gahra son of Amir1646/95 Dost Muhammad son of Sardar1645/95 Zafar Ali son of Sarang1644/95 Khuda Yar son of Sarang Lot No 2, Sq.No. 231/13/3,The petitioners appear to have deposited l/4th of the lease money. They have requested for extension of their leases upto Rabi, 1988 and further to allow them to deposit all the arrears/dues of lagan in easy instalments.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and have perused the record available in these files.

4. In these cases, the leases of the petitioners do not appear to have been cancelled. I, therefore, extend the same in their favour upto Rabi, 1998. The petitioners should deposit arrears of lagan, enhanced from the to the under Government instructions with penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each, in 8 equal half yearly instalments. The first instalment with the amount of penalty of Rs. 5,000/- each should be deposited within three months.

With the above observations/directions, all the revision petitions are disposed of.

For educational and research use only โ€” not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
DisclaimerยทPrivacyยทTermsยทSearch