ORDER AHMAD SAEED AWAN, J.- Sh. Umar Draz was reported against vide FIR No. 141, dated 21.3.1995 for offence under section 165/A PPC with Police Station Saddar Okara. According to FIR, the petitioner offered Rs. 1,20,000/- as illegal gratification to the complainant for the release of Muhammad Ashraf alias Bhola who was involved in a narcotic case.
2. In support of the petition, it was argued that the stary of the persecution is highly improbable and actually the petitioner was going to Faisalabad to purchase cloth for his shop and on persanal search, a sum of Rs. 1,50,000/- was taken by the Police and out of that only Rs. 1,20,000/- has been shown and Rs. 30,000/- were embezzled.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at quite some length and have also gone through the Police file preduced by the official. It is an admitted fact that the amount of Rs.
1,20,000/-.Has been taken into custody in accordance with law and the petitioner after investigation has been found guilty. Learned counsel for the petitioner was unable to point out any mala fide on the part of the police to falsely implicate the petitioner and plant recovery of such huge amount. Even otherwise the factual controversies cannot be gone into in exercise of extra ordinary Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court. Reliance can safely be placed on the case of Muhammad younas Khan and 12 others vs. Government of NWFP (1993 S.C.M.R. 618).
For all that has been stated above, this petition fails and is hereby dismissed.