1. ' SALEEM AKHTAR, J.---Salman Ahmed Ansari, the petitioner, addressed a letter to the Prime Minister of Pakistan on 5-9-1992 complaining about the inaction of the police and the executive and alleged partiality in respect of the report he had made about the kidnapping of his son who was later found murdered. A copy of this letter was also endorsed to the Chief Justice of Pakistan, who ordered it to be registered as a human right case and notices were issued to the law officers of the Federation and the Provinces. On 8-3-1993 the Court ordered Mr. Abdul Ghafoor Mangi, Additional Advocate-General, Sindh, to report within a month as to whether a criminal case has been registered or not with regard to the death of Ehsan Ahmed Ansari. A report dated 9-3-1993 by the S.H.O., Malir City Police Station, Karachi, addressed to the Advocate-General was filed giving full details of the case stating that F.I.R. No,135/91 under section 506/364/34/302, P.P.C. Was registered on 5-8-1991 on a written complaint received from the petitioner. The F.I.R. Was registered against unknown accused persons, but during investigation Najeeb Ahmad and Muhammad Shahzad Munir, the P.Ws. Have nominated Aftab Ahmad, Shahid and Salahuddin as accused persons. It was further stated that all efforts had been made to arrest the accused persons, but in vain. A report dated 21-4-1993 addressed on behalf of the S.S.P., District East, Karachi was submitted to the Additional Advocate-General, Sindh along with a copy of the written report made by the petitioner dated 4-8-1991, F.I.R. Dated 5-8-1991 and the challenged dated 31-12-1992. The learned A.A.-G.
2. Pointed out that actions permissible under law have been taken and case has been registered against the accused, but they are absconding and all efforts have been made through several agencies for their arrest. In the circumstances, the learned A.A.-G. States that the provisions of law having been complied with, this proceeding should be closed and matter may proceed in accordance with law. It seems that due to the abscission of the accused there has been delay in the proceeding of the case. In these circumstances, no further action is needed and 'the file may be closed.