1. WAHEEDUDIN AHMAD, J.-This is an application for review of the Order of this Court dismissing the petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 562/74 dated 28-5-75.
2. The dispute between the parties is in respect of mortgagee rights in the land in dispute. A suit was filed on 28-9-57. It was held by the trial Court that Mota Khan, predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner In 1954 had acknowledged the factum of mortgage The High Court has held this view to be correct and has maintained the decree- for redemption which was challenged by the petitioner in the above-mentioned application for special leave to appeal.
3. Mr. Raja Mohd. Muzaffar Khan, the learned counsel for the petitioner has contended that the question whether the seal on the report of the Patwari was an acknowledgment or an attestation requires further consideration. He contended that the interpretation given by this Court on 28-5-75 is erroneous.
4. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, we are satisfied that there is no error on the face of the record, nor the petitioner has referred to any additional evidence or any facts which were not within his knowledge in this petition. Mere fact that this Court has taken a wrong view of the point---s urged by the petitioner is no ground to interfere in review. We do not consider this as a fit case for interference. The petition is dis--missed. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.