DECISION ' The appellant was appointed as valveman BPS-3 in H.D.A. He was then promoted as Pressure Mistry BPS-5 and thereafter as a Plumber in BPS-6. His grievance was that instead of Plumber he should have been promoted as Junior Operator. The learned VIth Labour Court, Hyderabad dismissed the grievance petition holding that the appellant had no legal right guaranteed or secured to claim his promotion as Junior Operator. The appellant has therefore appealed.
2. Syed Fasahat Hussain Rizvi, Advocate for the appellant has remained absent. Appellant has therefore been heard in person. He cannot show any law or settlement under which he can claim his promotion as Junior Operator. The appellant states that the post of Junior Operator is also' n Grade-VI but there is opening for further promotion from that post. As Plumber, he cannot get higher promotion as a mechanic. These are not the matters which can be agitated in a petition under section 25-A of the I.R.O. This is not an industrial dispute which can be considered by the Labour Court.
' There is no substance in this appeal which is accordingly dismissed.