Pakistan Case Law← Search
1996 PLC 16

LUTFULLAH vs PRESIDING OFFICER, SINDH LABOUR COURT NO. VIII, LARKANA

Citation1996 PLC 16
CourtLabour Appellate Tribunal
Case No.Appeal No, LAK-257 of 1995
Date1995-08-28
Judge(s)Mushtaq Ali Kazi
ResultAppeal dismissed

DECISION Heard the appellant Lutfullah in person.

' This appeal is directed against the order of the 8th Labour Court, Larkana dismissing the petition of the appellant for reinstatement as cashier of Habib Bank Ratodero Branch.

2. The facts are that on 16-7-1984 the Zonal Chief visited the Habib Bank Ratodero Branch and detected Rs,5,000 to be short on checking the deposits. The appellant was then charge-sheeted and the domestic enquiry was held against him by the Vice-President. As a result of the enquiry his services were terminated. No appeal was filed by the appellant against the termination as a result of the departmental enquiry. After more than one year a criminal complaint was also lodged against the appellant by the Bank Manager Ratodero. By that time the account holder did not support the case against the appellant and on that account the Banking Tribunal acquitted the appellant in the criminal case. Thereafter, the appellant filed this petition for reinstatement before the Labour Court. The Labour Court found that since the criminal case was registered after one year of dismissal, and the appellant had moved after his acquittal in the criminal case, the grievance notice to the Bank authority was time-barred and the petition was not maintainable. He accordingly dismissed the petition for reinstatement. The appellant was dismissed from service as a result of domestic enquiry and his subsequent acquittal in the criminal case is of no consequence. The Bank officers specially the cashiers have to be above suspicion and they cannot be retained in service after any misappropriation is detected. The acquittal in criminal case is for different reasons and has no connection with the reasons which prompted the Vice-President of the Bank to dismiss the appellant.

For educational and research use only — not legal advice. Verify against the official report before relying on it. See our Disclaimer.
Disclaimer·Privacy·Terms·Search