1. ' The learned counsel for the complainant is present alongwith the complainant. The record of the case reveals that on various occasions the respondents/accused were served with notice, but they have intentionally avoided appearance before this Commission and resultantly, are still continued with their illegal and uncalled for actions against the management i,e, the complainant. It seems that they have decided to frustrate the process of this Commission, as well by not appearing before this Court. There is no other option with this Commission but to rely upon the affidavit of the complainant and to pass an order in accordance with the provisions of Regulation 32(1) of the N.I.R.C. (Procedure and Functions) Regulations, 1973. In such view of the matter it is held that the respondents/accused are guilty of the offences as claimed against them, under the provisions of section 16 of the I.R.O., 1969 for which the punishment is provided under section 53 of the I.R.O., 1969.
2. Therefore, the respondents/accused whose names are mentioned in para. No,7 of the complaint and the respondents Nos. 1 to 4 who are legal representative of the C.B.A., are fined with the sum of Rs,1,000 each. The file be consigned to record after completion of the necessary formalities.