DECISION ' The contention of the learned Advocate for the appellant is that under a new contract the appellants ceased to be workers of the sub-contractor M/s. Steffcon & Company and they became direct workers of the respondent Siemens Pakistan Company. The new letters of appointment have not however been produced showing this change of employment. On the contrary they have produced a letter which shows that they have been allowed to work against old contract entered into by Siemens with Steffcon who shall continue to make payments to them. The matter whether the appellants are workers of Siemens with Steffcon is pending before the Supreme Court. They should await the decision of the Supreme Court as ordered by the Labour Court. They have neither appointment order nor termination order given to them by Siemens Company.
2. Thus, the order of the Labour Court is maintained and this appeal is dismissed in limine.