' SHAFIUR RAHMAN, J.---Leave to appeal has been sought against the orders of the Lahore High Court dated 16-6-1992 whereby interim orders with regard to alterations in the disputed property which was the subject-matter of pre-emption suits were refused.
2. Whatever improvement was taking place and was anticipated was undertaken by the respondent to be at his own cost and risk and such an undertaking given by the respondent was considered a sufficient protection of the interest of the petitioner. We are satisfied that such an undertaking is a sufficient protection.
2-A. No question for further examination arises in the case. Hence, leave to appeal is refused.