1. ORDERNASIRA IQBAL, J. - The petitioner in this application under section 561-A Cr.P.C, seeks queashment of F.I.R. Nos. 335/93 and 483/92 registered at Police Station City-B Division Sheikhupura under sections 420/468/471 PPC. The contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the F.I.Rs. In which the petitioner is named accused, have been registered with mala fide intention of pressurising the petitioner who is in possession of an order of the Supreme Court in his favour and who .Is duly constituted general attorney of several persons who are owners of the property in respect of which the above two F.I.Rs. Have been registered.2. Learned counsel for the complainant as well counsel for the State and an official from the Police Station City-B Division have appeared. They have brought to the notice of the Court that investigation in both the aforesaid F.I.Rs. Has been completed and challans have been put up before the Ilaqa Magistrate City Sheikhupura and that in F.I.R.483/92 trial has commenced and statement of the complainant has been recorded. In case F.I.R. 335/93 the petitioner has been summoned and proceedings are about to commence. The petitioner thus has efficacious remedy of filing application u/S. 249-A Cr.P.C, before trial Court. Learned counsel for the petitioner has cited Kazim Ali Dossa v. State (1980 P.Cr.L.J. 818) and Manzoor Ahmad v. Nazir Ahmad etc. (1990 Law Notes (Lah) 996) to contend that the remedy under section 249-A Cr.P.C, is neither adequate nor efficacious. Learned counsel for the complainant has cited Ghulam Muhammad v. State (PLJ 1993 Cr.C. (Kar.) 191) to contend that the trial Court should be moved first.3. There are authorities to be cited on both the sides. Since eachcase proceeds on its own merits. I do not find this to be an appropriate stagefor interference since the case is before the Ilaqa Magistrate and he canexamine, the contentions of the petitioner if approached in this behalf. This petition is, therefore, dismissed. The petitioner may seek his remedy before the competent Court, if so advised. If petitioner approaches the trial Court his contentions may also be taken into consideration and the case may-be disposed of as expeditiously as possible.