JUDGMENT MUHAMMAD NASEEM, J. - The petitioners Claire to be the untrained teachers of Government recognised schools with the alleged qualification to appear in the C.T. Examination as private candidates. Their prayer in the matter has been refused by the respondents and they have invoked the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court to get the proposed relief that they are entitle to appear as untrained teachers in the C.T. Examination. The comments have been sent by the Chairman, Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, Multan who has expressed there that according to notification dated 18.5.1993 the petitioners being the untrained teachers of the private registered schools ar^ not entitled to appear as the private candidates for C.T. Examination.
2. I have heard the preliminary arguments addressed by the learned counsel for the petitioners who mainly canvassed before me that the petitioners are entitled to appear in the C.T. Examination as the untrained teachers while they a re Working in the Government registered schools. In my view the relevant notification dated 18.5.1993 being reproduced as under shall resolve the controversy:- , GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Notification No. S.O. (Boards) 1-131/92.- The Controlling Authority of the Punjab Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education, has been pleased to decide that henceforth PTC, CTOT and Arts and Crafts Examination which were previously being conducted by their respective Directorate of Education (Schools) would now be conducted by the respective Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education in the Punjab under the following conditions:-
(i) The Board would conduct examination of PTC/CT of those students only, whoa re admitted in the Government Institutions. Private students would not be eligible for the said examination.
(ii) Syllabi and courses of studies will remain same.
(iii) Examination fee for PTC would be charged equal to the fee of Matriculation Examination.
Similarly, the candidate for CT Examination would pay Examination fee equal tot he fee being charged from the students of FA/F.Sc.
(iv) Examination Schedule would however be determined by the respective Boards in consultation with the respective directorate of Education (Schools).
BY ORDER OF THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY.
EDUCATION SECRETARY Dated Lahore the 18th May, 1993
2. Following Notification dated 24.7.1993 is also relevant in the matter:- GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Notification No. S.O. (Boards) 1-131/92.- In continuation of this Department's Notification of even number dated 18.5.1993, the Controlling Authority of the Punjab Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education has been pleased to allow the in-service trained PTC Teachers to take CT, OT and Arts and Crafts Examinations conducted by the respective Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education.
BY ORDER OF THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY.
TANWIR AHMAD EDUCATION SECRETARY Dated Lahore the 18th May, 1993.
3. Further Notification dated 17.8.1993 provides as under:- GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB EDUCATION DEPARTMENT Notification No. S.O. (Boards) 1-131/92.-- The Controlling Authority of the Punjab Boards of Intermediate and Secondary Education/Government of the Punjab' has been pleased to allow the in service untrained teachers working in Government Schools (Provincial/Federal), Local Body (Metropolitan Corporation, Corporations and Town Committees) to appear as private candidates in C.T., O.T., P.T.C.
And Arts and Crafts Examination to be conducted by the Boards subject to their eligibility to be determined by the concerned authority.
BY ORDER OF THE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY.
TANWIR AHMAD EDUCATION SECRETARY Dated Lahore the 17 August, 1993.
5. In the aforesaid Notifications the untrained teachers working in Government recognised schools have not beep included. This is the crux of the matter to make me hold that the petitioners are not entitled to appear as the private candidates in CT Examination.
6. Hence relying on the aforesaid all the Notifications which were issued before the bringing of this writ petition, I hold that the petitioners have no case and this writ petition in dismissed in limine.