' ABDUL QADEER CHAUDHRY, J.---The petitioner seeks leave to appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 8-3-1993.
2. The facts in brief are that the petitioner, while working is Sub-Inspector, Cooperative Society, demanded Rs,1,000 as illegal gratification from Muhammad All Tariq, Cashier of the said society, for preparation of case of grant of loan. A raid under the supervision of Magistrate was arranged and the petitioner was apprehended and the tainted amount was recovered from him. The conversation made by the petitioner with the complainant was also heard by the Magistrate. The complainant examined five witnesses including the complainant and the raiding Magistrate. The plea of the accused was that the complainant P.W.2 was a defaulter in the payment of earlier loan and the amount of Rs,1,000 was handed over to him for depositing the same in the Bank on the complainant's behalf. This plea has not been accepted by the two Courts. The numbers of currency notes had been recorded by the Magistrate and the same currency notes were recovered from the petitioner. No ill-will has been alleged against the learned Magistrate, who supervised the raid.
There are concurrent findings of fact by the Courts. There is no misreading of evidence.
' This petition has no force. The same is dismissed and the leave prayed for is refused. revisions by the competent authorities. Therefore, it is advisable to consult the official sources or legal professionals for the most up-to-date and accurate information.